Towards a reasonable business expenses rule
|Category|| Technical Articles
Article by Oyebode Oyetunde, Solicitor. This article appeared in the August 2006 issue of Tax Adviser. KEY POINTS
- The all or nothing, 'wholly and exclusively' rule applied to determine the tax deductibility of expenses for tax (Schedule D Case I and II, Schedule E and VAT) purposes may lead to inequities and inefficiences as illustrated by UK case law.
- While economic theories (notably, optimal tax theory) provide considerable insights into alternative formulations of the deductibility rule, some of these are fraught with difficulties that hinder practical implementation.
- A 'but for' reasonable business expenses rule, which used practical tools such as the dissection and apportionment of work-related expenses from personal expenditure, could provide a more economically efficient alternative to the all or nothing, 'wholly and exclusively' rule.
- The benefits of the 'but for' reasonable business expenses rule would be further enhanced if the rule was applied on a sensible, sectoral basis, as illustrated by the Australian tax system.
020 7235 9381
August 2006 by