Skip navigation |

The EMAG case - a matter of opinion

Category Technical Articles
AuthorLisa Herd
Patrick Walker, UK head of indirect tax and Jo Bello, indirect tax director, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, discuss the implications of the Advocate General's Opinion in the EMAG Handel case When looking at the facts and conclusions of the Advocate General's (AG) opinion in EMAG Handel Eder OHG v Finanzlandsdirektion fur kärnten Berufungssenat ll ('the EMAG case') before the European Court of Justice (ECJ), some tax advisers may decide that the case will not change the way a business must think about chain transactions, or international movements of goods for VAT purposes. Some may also think that this is how we would always have seen things in the UK and that the Austrian tax authorities were wrong. But if they read the AG's opinion is just that - an opinion - but this case looks like an important one to watch out for because it could mean that companies will need to think about how their systems have been configured to deal with such transactions.

Technical Department
020 7235 9381

March 2006 by Patrick Walker


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the The Chartered Institute of Taxation website. To find out more about the cookies, see our privacy policy.