Skip navigation |

VAT abuse

Category Technical Articles
AuthorSeverin Alexander
Article by Stanley Dencher, Senior Technical Editor, CCH Information. This article appeared in the June 2005 issue of Tax Adviser. Background

In Halifax plc, construction services were routed through ‘special purpose companies’ to improve the group’s VAT recovery. The tribunal decided that such planning is a counter-economic activity. It disregarded the transactions undertaken by the ‘special purpose companies’ because supply and activity under Directive 77/388, the sixth VAT directive, do not apply to such transactions. Thus, the construction services were supplied direct to the end user, which could recover only part of the VAT charged on the construction services.
--
Technical Department
020 7235 8981

Related Links

 

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the The Chartered Institute of Taxation website. To find out more about the cookies, see our privacy policy.